Nord-West Romania: Stakeholder Type

Nord-West Romania: Thematic Area

Nord-West Romania: Access to R&I Infrastructure and Services The Y axis represents the number of respondents.

*1.1. There is high alignment of research priorities and industry needs.
*1.2. There are joint strategies between private and public actors towards shared goals.
*1.3. There is some R&I infrastructure available in my region.
*1.4. There are clear and transparent modalities to access the available R&I infrastructure.
*1.5. Innovation service needs are identified via interactive and inclusive governance processes.
*1.6a. There are professional service providers operating close to UNIVERSITIES (e.g., TTOs, IPR experts, incubators, accelerators, etc).
*1.6b. There are professional service providers operating close to COMPANIES (e.g., R&I consulting firms, IPR experts, clusters, incubators, accelerators, etc).
*1.7. There should be more demand for innovation support services.

Nord-West Romania: Policy Support and Governance Processes The Y axis represents the number of respondents.

*2.1. There is awareness among local policymakers of the importance and benefits of research and innovation.
*2.2. The public policies carried out locally are consistent with the needs of private actors.
*2.3a. Major steps forward are achieved by individual champions.
*2.3b. Major steps forward are achieved by inclusive and forward-looking governance.
*2.4a. There is long-term policy support and availability of REGIONAL funding for innovation.
*2.4b. There is long-term policy support and availability of NATIONAL funding for innovation.
*2.4c. There is long-term policy support and availability of EU funding for innovation.
*2.5. There are sufficient incentives and/or resources allocated to retain talent and young researchers.
*2.6. There are sufficient incentives targeting collaboration between industry and academia actors.
*2.7. The different financial resources (private fees, public direct funding, public funding to competitive projects etc.) are well balanced.
*2.8. There are good levels of trust and exchange among key stakeholders.
*2.9. There is a balance of power across key stakeholder groups.
*2.10. The local governance processes are balanced, transparent, open, and evidence-based.
*2.11. Good governance models to manage shared resources are put in place.
*2.12. The processes of local governance involve active engagement of civil society.
*2.13. There is a common focus on environmental sustainability of innovation processes.
*2.14. There are none or only minor regulatory hurdles (to e.g., researcher public-private mobility, or research commercialization).

Nord-West Romania: Collaboration and Knowledge Transfer
The Y axis represents the number of respondents.

*3.1a. There is an affirmed collaboration culture within your region
*3.1b. There is an affirmed collaboration culture between public and private actors in your region.
*3.1c. There is an affirmed collaboration culture between your and other European regions.
*3.2. The regional authority supports collaboration with partners from other European regions (financial or non-financial support).
*3.3. There is a strong collaboration culture between local universities, research organisations, local key industries, large companies, and local SME clusters.
*3.4. There is extensive experience in science-industry collaboration, including shared objectives and common strategies for economic and industrial development.
*3.5. There is close collaboration between private investors and entrepreneurs.
*3.6. There should be more commercialisation of local research results.
*3.7. Research and project results are effectively and sufficiently communicated to the local community and relevant stakeholders.
*3.8. There is good availability of skilled staff.
*3.9. There is good knowledge transfer based on collaborations.
*3.10. Leading local companies participate in one or more of the following: clustering, corporate venturing, shared resources, and targeted industry need initiatives (e.g., hackathons).